[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87skxkepr0.fsf@saeurebad.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:32:03 +0200
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
Hi,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> - extensive damage to the page-flags patches
>
> Did you check that all architectures and configurations still have
> sufficient page flags for us to be able to consume another one for
> kmemcheck? The MM developers have put much, much effort into avoiding
> running out of flags over numerous years and afaik none of them even know
> that this debug feature is using one of the few remaining ones.
>
> What do we do when we run out?
Would it be feasible to add another unsigned long to struct page? I
mean, extending such a common structure always sucks, but for
emergency...
#define PageFoobar(page) test_bit(PG_foobar, &(page)->flags2)
Of course the essential core flags should always be in ->flags but
perhaps we could have a symbol CONFIG_NEED_EXTRA_PAGE_FLAGS that gets
selected by kmemcheck (and other candidates that are unlikely to be
enabled most of the time) and then #ifndef ->flags2 out.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists