[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020804170342x7d692e83x2b50ebbccfc4c40b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > We (still!) have not made the decision whether to proceed with slab or
> > slub. How hard would it be to port kmemcheck into slab?
>
> i think slab is clearly out, unless some catastrophic regression is
> found. But Nick's SLQB might replace SLUB ;-)
Hey, we all have our favorite replacements for kmalloc():
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/penberg/patches/binalloc/2.6.25-rc8/kmalloc-binning
But it seems unrealistic to expect any of them to replace SLUB or SLAB
in the near future.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists