lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020804170342x7d692e83x2b50ebbccfc4c40b@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:42:38 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	"Nick Piggin" <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26

On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>  > We (still!) have not made the decision whether to proceed with slab or
>  > slub.  How hard would it be to port kmemcheck into slab?
>
>  i think slab is clearly out, unless some catastrophic regression is
>  found. But Nick's SLQB might replace SLUB ;-)

Hey, we all have our favorite replacements for kmalloc():

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/penberg/patches/binalloc/2.6.25-rc8/kmalloc-binning

But it seems unrealistic to expect any of them to replace SLUB or SLAB
in the near future.

                             Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ