[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080417070129.2bb99e2c@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 07:01:29 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:38:00 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Thank you whoever wrote kmemcheck.txt
> >
> > How come slub uses one byte to track the status of each byte when
> > it could use a single bit?
> >
> > We (still!) have not made the decision whether to proceed with slab
> > or slub. How hard would it be to port kmemcheck into slab?
>
> i think slab is clearly out, unless some catastrophic regression is
> found.
SLUB still has that several percent TPC-C regression....
Christoph has a small reproducer testcase.
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists