[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080417170844.GA5575@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:08:44 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, serue@...ibm.com,
penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v9)]
On 04/17, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> CLONE_THREAD without CLONE_VM when creating a new subthread.
> >
> > No, no, this is not possible/allowed.
> >
> > Please look at copy_process, CLONE_THREAD requires CLONE_SIGHAND,
> > CLONE_SIGHAND needs CLONE_VM.
> >
>
> What about the other way round, CLONE_VM without CLONE_THREAD?
Yes, this is possible, and this is why mm_update_next_owner() has to be so
complicated. The same for zap_threads/elf_core_dump.
If only I knew why we allow CLONE_VM! except for CLONE_THREAD/CLONE_VFORK
of course, but there are trivial.
And thanks to you and Paul for your explanations.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists