[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208397123.4322.21.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:52:03 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Adam J. Richter" <adam@...drasil.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 20:40 +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
[...]
> >> >--- a/include/crypto/aes.h
> >> >+++ b/include/crypto/aes.h
> >> >@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >> >
> >> > struct crypto_aes_ctx {
> >> > u32 key_length;
> >> >+ u32 _pad1;
> >>
> >> Why is this pad required? Do you want special alignment of the keys?
> >
> >Because the key is loaded in 64bit in this patch, I want to align the
> >key with 64bit address.
>
> Than this won't work all the time. To make it bulletproof
> - set .cra_alignmask in the glue code properly
> - use the attribute aligned thing
> - retrieve your private struct via crypto_tfm_ctx_aligned()
As far as I know, the CRYPTO_MINALIGN is defined in
include/linux/crypto.h as __alignof__(unsigned long long), and the
__crt_ctx in crypto_tfm is aligned in CRYPTO_MINALIGN. So I think adding
a pad is sufficient for x86_64 implementation.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists