lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080418013857.92824cfb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:38:57 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	benh@...nel.crashing.org
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use __weak macro for smp_setup_processor_id

On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 18:19:07 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:07 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:56:18 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Use the __weak macro instead of the longer __attribute__ ((weak)) form
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > > --
> > > 
> > >  init/main.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-18 16:44:32.000000000 +1000
> > > +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-18 16:44:37.000000000 +1000
> > > @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static void __init boot_cpu_init(void)
> > >  	cpu_set(cpu, cpu_possible_map);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -void __init __attribute__((weak)) smp_setup_processor_id(void)
> > > +void __init __weak smp_setup_processor_id(void)
> > >  {
> > >  }
> > 
> > ack on all three. Please fold #3 into #1 and add both to git-powerpc.
> 
> Damn ! I took 5mn to actually split it out in order to not do two
> different things in one patch :-)

ah, I misread it.  I thought this was changing the __attribute__((weak))
which patch #1 added.  But it's changing a different one.  I though that
was odd.

> Will do.

whatever ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ