[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080418094239.GA26393@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:42:39 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v2.6.26] what's brewing in x86.git for v2.6.26
* Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@...y.mif.pg.gda.pl> wrote:
>> and you'll see the trace events go by, live. The user-space bits of
>> sysprof have been ported over to ftrace/sysprof already and it's a
>> really nice tool that shows a deep stack-trace based hierarchical
>> "vertical" profile instead of the usual finegrained profile.
>
> Does it meany Linux give up implementing DTrace way of
> tracing/instrumntation ? In last time I observe more and more signs
> inroducing parallel ways of tracing/instrumentations infrasctructures
> in Linux kernel where all this can be rolled into only one .. common.
the goal of having more generic markers is still possible and being
aimed for - for in-kernel utilization like SystemTap, lttng, utrace,
ftrace and similar. The latest iteration of markers looks rather
promising in terms of giving us near-zero-cost probe points.
(and last i checked dtrace was not capable of doing something like
mmiotrace - so it's a different thing.)
so dont worry :)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists