linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25 released with bug, which leads to XFS crash?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804181332.31177.denys@visp.net.lb>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:32:30 +0300
From:	Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@...p.net.lb>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25 released with bug, which leads to XFS crash?

AUFS(same as COSS, UFS, NULL) is way of handling with cache storage in squid, and nothing else. It is userspace and not involved deeply with kernel things.
Since long long time i didn't had any single problem with it.
Kernel is fully vanilla.

On Friday 18 April 2008 10:40, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 07:39:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > > Hi again
> > > 
> > > I reported about http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10421 , and it is triggerable on different loaded servers with XFS (squid with aufs),
> > 
> > Oh, aufs was not listed in the bug report.  that's an out of tree
> > module, right?  Is it completely up to date and safe with 2.6.25?
> 
> And it's a completely crappy one.  I personally would through away every
> bug report with that piece of junk involved.
> 
> 

-- 
------
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
Lebanon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/