[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48092CFC.9090708@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:21:32 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] slub: add hooks for kmemcheck
Hi,
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> Should this not go into some kmemcheck.h file?
>> The implementations of these prototypes are in mm/slub_kmemcheck.c.
>> They are only ever called from slub.c since they represent the
>> interface between SLUB and kmemcheck.
>>
>> Would you rather have it in include/linux/slub_kmemcheck.h?
>
> Well lets see what Pekka says.
Well, I've tried to push for "generic" kmemcheck hooks so that they can
be used by SLAB/SLOB too but Vegard has always talked me out of it. Of
course, I have long forgotten the rationale.
But anyway, slub_kmemcheck.h sounds okay and I wonder if we should put
it in mm/ instead of include/linux/ as it's not supposed to be included
by anyone except SLUB?
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Currently, with SLAB/SLUB debugging enabled, the page flag will be
>> cleared, then accessed in check_object(), thus generating a few
>> accesses to the page. It is safer to delay the clearing of the page
>> flag until no more accesses can be generated for the page.
>
> Hmmmm.. Okay that is already dealt with by a patch in Pekka's tree.
And merged by Linus now.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists