| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080417224908.67cec814@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:49:08 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on > an 8-way x86_64 box and: > > > stack-protector: > > Testing -fstack-protector-all feature > No -fstack-protector-stack-frame! > -fstack-protector-all test failed do you have a stack-protector capable GCC? I guess not. This is a catch-22. You do not have stack-protector. Should we make that a silent failure? or do you want to know that you don't have a security feature you thought you had.... complaining seems to be the right thing to do imo. -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists