linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080418070913.GA16599@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:09:13 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good


* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> 
> I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on an
> 8-way x86_64 box and:
> 
> 
> stack-protector:
> 
> Testing -fstack-protector-all feature
> No -fstack-protector-stack-frame!
> -fstack-protector-all test failed

that's the stackprotector self-test: you probably have a gcc that cannot 
build a proper stackprotector kernel. No damage other than having no 
stackprotector. Arjan Cc:-ed.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/