[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480A20F8.6020802@tuffmail.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:42:32 +0100
From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Self-snapshotting in Linux
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-04-16 14:50:46, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>
>> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>>> I guess there is the hardware / drivers issue. I would like to claim
>>>> I've found hibernation to be reliable but unfortunately that's not
>>>> 100% true.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So debug it, it is open source after all. Or at least file a bugs.
>>>
>>>
>> I definitely want to debug it; I love hibernating. It's a regression and
>> it'll affect my distro kernel once I upgrade to Ubuntu Hardy.
>>
>> <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10196> "Backtraces during
>> hibernate / resume".
>>
>> I posted the backtraces but nobody could tell me what they were - they
>> don't actually say whether they're OOPs or BUGs etc. They might be
>> softlockups - some times I got softlockup warnings, though thats not in the
>> log I posted.
>>
>
> Not sure what that is, I never seen that before.
>
> Can you try vanilla 2.6.25-rc9 or something?
>
I've just retested with 2.6.25. I reproduced the hang that happens
after (otherwise successful) hibernation. After a second hibernation &
resume I reproduced the mysterious call-traces.
I posted this information, a full system log (including 2 hibernation
cycles and the calltraces), and the kernel config to the bugzilla entry.
This was in response to Rafael's request on the bugzilla. So I expect
someone will look at it anyway, but I thought I should copy you on this.
Thanks,
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists