[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080419135047.5f77dfdb@ephemeral>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:50:47 -0400
From: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: jfannin@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
jordan.crouse@....com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1
On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:38:33 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:25:44 -0400 Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:29:25 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:10:24 -0400 Joseph Fannin <jfannin@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 01:47:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > which we probably just shouldn't do this at all unless we're running on the
> > > OLPC hardware. But we need to do this to find out if we're running on the OLPC
> > > hardware! Perhaps the warning should just be removed.
> >
> > Hm. We could either protect that code with an:
> >
> > if (!is_geode())
> > return;
> >
> > Or I could add the OpenFirmware patches which would allow us to get
> > rid of this code, and instead check for the existence of OFW using
> > that.
> >
> > The former is quick and easy; the latter is (imo) nicer, so long as
> > people don't have problems w/ the OFW code. :)
> >
>
> Do both ;)
>
> The quick-n-easy version sounds suitable for now.
Heh, I already had sent the nicer version. If people have some fundamental
problem w/ it, I can send the quick-n-easy version.
--
Need a kernel or Debian developer? Contact me, I'm looking for contracts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists