[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208631259.6452.26.camel@lappy>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:54:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull] scheduler changes for v2.6.26
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 20:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On 4/19/08, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > > Guillaume Chazarain (1):
> > > sched: fix rq->clock overflows detection with CONFIG_NO_HZ
> >
> > This one should have been dropped (per
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/25/413) I don't like rq->clock relying on
> > jiffies, and you already fixed the original manifestation of the
> > problem in:
>
> no, it was still needed on a testbox of Peter on nohz.
Yeah, I got a rq->clock rate of about 500ms every second. With this
patch I got the full 1000.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists