linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.4.36.3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480A5008.40300@zytor.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:03:20 -0400
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.36.3

Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 03:22:59PM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Any reason to have 2.4.x.y instead of just 2.4.x+y?  I find it somewhat 
>> hard to believe there is substantial new development on 2.4, so it 
>> really should be all "stable".
> 
> Since 2.4.33 there have been a few minor add-ons and backports (support
> for gcc4, e1000 update, and mmap_min_addr come to mind). It's important
> for me to indicate when users can blindly upgrade (eg: security fix or
> real bug) and when they should at least perform a quick revalidation.
> 
> This has worked well for quite some time now. Since the changes were
> really minor here, I did not want to open 2.4.37 with just that. Maybe
> there will be no 2.4.37, maybe I'll open it if I gather several significant
> driver/arch updates or build fixes (eg: gcc is not supported beyond 4.1
> right now).
> 

OK, makes sense.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/