[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080419212311.GD1554@Krystal>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 17:23:11 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...l.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v5)
* Andi Kleen (andi@...stfloor.org) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org> writes:
> >
> > It uses RCU-style updates and has been designed to be lockless from the
> > ground up.
>
> RCU is not necessarily NMI safe. In most cases RCU needs writer locks
> which you cannot do with NMIs.
>
> -Andi
>
RCU-style updates are done outside of NMIs, in sleepable context. That's
just required when the probes connected on markers must be
registered/unregistered.
The NMI context is the RCU read side. It only have to get the probe
function pointers to call along with the private data pointers.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists