[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080418223413.2445b970@siona.local>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 22:34:13 -0400
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: fix negative check on unsigned
Cc'ing the atmel_lcdfb maintainer...
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 06:31:28 +0200
Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl> wrote:
> No signed negative values will get noticed
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> index fc65c02..4b927da 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> @@ -422,13 +422,13 @@ static int atmel_lcdfb_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>
> value = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_value_khz, PICOS2KHZ(info->var.pixclock));
>
> - value = (value / 2) - 1;
> - dev_dbg(info->device, " * programming CLKVAL = 0x%08lx\n", value);
> -
> - if (value <= 0) {
> + if ((value / 2) <= 1) {
> + dev_dbg(info->device, " * programming CLKVAL = 0x%08lx\n", (value/2)-1);
Makes sense...although I think there's another patch in the queue that
fixes this as well.
> dev_notice(info->device, "Bypassing pixel clock divider\n");
> lcdc_writel(sinfo, ATMEL_LCDC_LCDCON1, ATMEL_LCDC_BYPASS);
> } else {
> + value = (value / 2) - 1;
> + dev_dbg(info->device, " * programming CLKVAL = 0x%08lx\n", value);
> lcdc_writel(sinfo, ATMEL_LCDC_LCDCON1, value << ATMEL_LCDC_CLKVAL_OFFSET);
> info->var.pixclock = KHZ2PICOS(clk_value_khz / (2 * (value + 1)));
> dev_dbg(info->device, " updated pixclk: %lu KHz\n",
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists