[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080419234039.GH20138@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:40:39 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 23/27] Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization NMI MCE support
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:24:20PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul Mackerras (paulus@...ba.org) wrote:
> > Mathieu Desnoyers writes:
> >
> > > * Paul Mackerras (paulus@...ba.org) wrote:
> > > > Mathieu Desnoyers writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Use an atomic update for immediate values.
> > > >
> > > > What is meant by an "atomic" update in this context? AFAICS you are
> > > > using memcpy, which is not in any way guaranteed to be atomic.
> > > >
> > > > Paul.
> > >
> > > I expect memcpy to perform the copy in one memory access, given I put a
> > >
> > > .align 2
> > >
> > > before the 2 bytes instruction. It makes sure the instruction modified
> > > fits in a single, aligned, memory write.
> >
> > My original question was in the context of the powerpc architecture,
> > where instructions are always 4 bytes long and aligned. So that's not
> > an issue.
> >
>
> Sorry, I meant 4 byte instruction with 2 bytes immediate value, but we
> both understand it would be a memory write aligned on 2 bytes since we
> only change the immediate value.
>
> > > Or maybe am I expecting too much from memcpy ?
> >
> > I don't think memcpy gives you any such guarantees. It would be quite
> > within its rights to say "it's only a few bytes, I'll do it byte by
> > byte".
> >
> > If you really want it to be atomic (which I agree is probably a good
> > idea), I think the best way to do it is to use an asm to generate a
> > sth (store halfword) instruction to the immediate field (instruction
> > address + 2). That's on powerpc of course; I don't know what you
> > would do on other architectures.
> >
>
> A simple
>
> *(uint16_t* )destptr = newvalue;
>
> seems to generate the "sth" instruction.
>
> Do you see any reason why the compiler could choose a different, non
> atomic assembler primitive ?
>
> quoting Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt :
>
> "In contrast, RCU-based updaters typically take advantage of the fact
> that writes to single aligned pointers are atomic on modern CPUs"
>
> Paul E. McKenney could say if I am wrong if I assume that any object
> smaller or equal to the architecture pointer size, aligned on a multiple
> of its own size, will be read or written atomically.
There have been CPUs in the past for which this was false. I am not aware
of any these days, but I would need to ask the architecture maintainers.
A lot depends on the compiler as well as the CPU, of course. :-(
Thanx, Paul
> Therefore, I would suggest the following replacement patch :
>
>
> Immediate Values - Powerpc Optimization NMI MCE support
>
> Use an atomic update for immediate values.
>
> - Changelog :
> Use a direct assignment instead of memcpy to be sure the update is
> atomic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile | 1
> arch/powerpc/kernel/immediate.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-powerpc/immediate.h | 18 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/kernel/immediate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/kernel/immediate.c 2008-04-16 21:22:29.000000000 -0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
> +/*
> + * Powerpc optimized immediate values enabling/disabling.
> + *
> + * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/immediate.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +#include <asm/page.h>
> +
> +#define LI_OPCODE_LEN 2
> +
> +/**
> + * arch_imv_update - update one immediate value
> + * @imv: pointer of type const struct __imv to update
> + * @early: early boot (1), normal (0)
> + *
> + * Update one immediate value. Must be called with imv_mutex held.
> + */
> +int arch_imv_update(const struct __imv *imv, int early)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
> + kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
> + /*
> + * Fail if a kprobe has been set on this instruction.
> + * (TODO: we could eventually do better and modify all the (possibly
> + * nested) kprobes for this site if kprobes had an API for this.
> + */
> + switch (imv->size) {
> + case 1: /* The uint8_t points to the 3rd byte of the
> + * instruction */
> + insn = (void *)(imv->imv - 1 - LI_OPCODE_LEN);
> + break;
> + case 2: insn = (void *)(imv->imv - LI_OPCODE_LEN);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(!early && *insn == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)) {
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Immediate value in conflict with kprobe. "
> + "Variable at %p, "
> + "instruction at %p, size %lu\n",
> + (void *)imv->imv,
> + (void *)imv->var, imv->size);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + /*
> + * If the variable and the instruction have the same value, there is
> + * nothing to do.
> + */
> + switch (imv->size) {
> + case 1: if (*(uint8_t *)imv->imv == *(uint8_t *)imv->var)
> + return 0;
> + *(uint8_t *)imv->imv = *(uint8_t *)imv->var;
> + break;
> + case 2: if (*(uint16_t *)imv->imv == *(uint16_t *)imv->var)
> + return 0;
> + *(uint16_t *)imv->imv = *(uint16_t *)imv->var;
> + break;
> + default:return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + flush_icache_range(imv->imv, imv->imv + imv->size);
> + return 0;
> +}
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-powerpc/immediate.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/asm-powerpc/immediate.h 2008-04-16 12:25:42.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/asm-powerpc/immediate.h 2008-04-16 20:49:48.000000000 -0400
> @@ -12,6 +12,16 @@
>
> #include <asm/asm-compat.h>
>
> +struct __imv {
> + unsigned long var; /* Identifier variable of the immediate value */
> + unsigned long imv; /*
> + * Pointer to the memory location that holds
> + * the immediate value within the load immediate
> + * instruction.
> + */
> + unsigned char size; /* Type size. */
> +} __attribute__ ((packed));
> +
> /**
> * imv_read - read immediate variable
> * @name: immediate value name
> @@ -19,6 +29,11 @@
> * Reads the value of @name.
> * Optimized version of the immediate.
> * Do not use in __init and __exit functions. Use _imv_read() instead.
> + * Makes sure the 2 bytes update will be atomic by aligning the immediate
> + * value. Use a normal memory read for the 4 bytes immediate because there is no
> + * way to atomically update it without using a seqlock read side, which would
> + * cost more in term of total i-cache and d-cache space than a simple memory
> + * read.
> */
> #define imv_read(name) \
> ({ \
> @@ -40,6 +55,7 @@
> PPC_LONG "%c1, ((1f)-2)\n\t" \
> ".byte 2\n\t" \
> ".previous\n\t" \
> + ".align 2\n\t" \
> "li %0,0\n\t" \
> "1:\n\t" \
> : "=r" (value) \
> @@ -52,4 +68,6 @@
> value; \
> })
>
> +extern int arch_imv_update(const struct __imv *imv, int early);
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_IMMEDIATE_H */
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile 2008-04-16 12:23:07.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile 2008-04-16 12:25:44.000000000 -0400
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION) += swsusp.o su
> obj64-$(CONFIG_HIBERNATION) += swsusp_asm64.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module_$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE).o
> obj-$(CONFIG_44x) += cpu_setup_44x.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_IMMEDIATE) += immediate.o
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_MERGE),y)
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists