[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18441.50147.324276.27512@harpo.it.uu.se>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:05:23 +0200
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To: dean gaudet <dean@...tic.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Alternative implementation of the generic __ffs
dean gaudet writes:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 18:11 -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> > > have you benchmarked it?
> >
> > I modified Alexander's benchmark:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/18/267
> > to include 32 and 64 bit variants called smallest.
> >
> > On an old ARM:
>
> i'm guessing the 32-bit constants suck :(
>
> the code could be modified to use 16-bit constants only
16-bit immediates don't help, as ARMs express immediate
operands in arithmetic instructions as 8-bit values plus
a 4-bit rotation count (which is multiplied by 2).
Very new ARMs can construct full 16-bit immediates, but
that still takes an additional instruction and an additional
register.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists