linux-kernel - Re: migration thread and active_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:35:19 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	"Dan Upton" <upton.dan.linux@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: migration thread and active_load_balance

"Dan Upton" <upton.dan.linux@...il.com> writes:

[not a scheduler expert; just some general comments]

> I'm using thread-local variables and really all I'm doing
> right now is assignments to them.  Unless, of course the struct rq
> (from rq = cpu_rq(cpu);) could be being manipulated elsewhere,

Other CPUs can access it yes subject to the lock. You can test that
theory by running with only one CPU.

> leading
> to some sort of race condition...
>
> Anyway, like I said, I've spent several days trying to understand this
> error by putting in printk()s galore and doing traces through the

That might be obvious, but are you aware that printks inside
the scheduler can lead to deadlocks? printk when the buffer
is full calls wake_up and that calls the scheduler. So for
debugging the scheduler you need some other way to get
the information out.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/