[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480BB85A.6020508@firstfloor.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:40:42 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default
Daniel Hazelton wrote:
> At 12 threads per request it'd only take about 4200 outstanding requests. That
> is high, but I can see it happening.
If it happens it just won't work on 32bit.
> Just makes you sound foolish. Run the numbers yourself and you'll see that it
> is easy for a machine running highly threaded code to easily hit 50K threads.
I ran the numbers and the numbers showed that you need > 1.5GB of lowmem
with a somewhat realistic scenario (32K per thread) at 50k threads. And
subtracting 4k from that 32k number won't make any significant
difference (still 1.3GB)
If you claim that works on a 32bit system with typically 300-600MB
lowmem available (which is also shared by other subsystem) I know who
sounds foolish.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists