[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480BC87C.9060305@garzik.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:49:32 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, kernel@...tstofly.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] ARM minor irq handler cleanups
Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 06:17:32PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> If we had a migration plan (ie: request_irq_new(), above) then this of
>>> course wouldn't be a problem.
>> A fair comment...
>
> Then we'll be stuck with request_irq_new() for the next 10 years or so.
(un-hijacking topic <grin>)
Another fair comment. I am secretly hoping for the ease of a flag day
(a la pt_regs) rather than a decade-long transition, but I readily to
confess to dodging the entire issue by doing all these cleanups first :)
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists