[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080421.121540.84605023.Hiroshi.DOYU@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:15:40 +0300 (EEST)
From: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
To: dbaryshkov@...il.com
Cc: paul@...an.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com,
rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, lethal@...ux-sh.org,
philipp.zabel@...il.com, pavel@....cz, tony@...mide.com,
david-b@...bell.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework
Hi Dmitry,
From: "ext Dmitry" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clocklib: generic clocks framework
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:48:24 +0400
> > - Hiroshi DOYU has proposed an alternate debugfs implementation for the
> > Linux-OMAP clock tree. I prefer it to yours, as it implements each
> > clock as a separate dentry, which makes it easy to implement additional
> > debugging functions, such as set_rate/set_parent/round_rate debugging.
> > Perhaps you'd consider it, or something similar to it, instead? It is
> > proposed here:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg00751.html
>
> I'll look at this. However, if we are going to use such
> implementation, may we should
> move instead to sysfs?
This has been discussed within the above thread in omap and you can
find the sysfs implementation sysfs at the bottom of the following:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg00696.html
Hiroshi DOYU
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists