linux-kernel - Re: poor network loopback performance and scalability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080421101908.GC9295@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:19:08 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, dada1@...mosbay.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: poor network loopback performance and scalability

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:16:23AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> What's being discussed is having the top of the transmit call path
> getting a socket "buffer" pointer, that it can feed back into the
> packet input path directly.  Loopback would return buffer pointers
> from ->hard_start_xmit() instead of passing them netif_rx().  The top
> of the transmit call path, upon getting a non-NULL buffer returned,
> would pass it to netif_receive_skb().

Yes this will definitely reduce the per-packet cost.  The other
low-hanging fruit is to raise the loopback MTU to just below 64K.
I belive the current value is a legacy from the days when we didn't
support skb page frags so everything had to be physically contiguous.

Longer term we could look at generating packets > 64K on lo, for
IPv6 anyway.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/