linux-kernel - Re: [bug] build failure in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480C780C.2030402@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:18:36 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bug] build failure in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c, on	latest
 -git

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
>> You got a bug fix in 5 minutes after sending your email to the lists, 
>> and since you sent it to lkml anybody can find it, so I don't see what 
>> the big deal is.
> 
> for the last 3 days my own automated bug finding capacity is at 10% of 
> its normal throughput (it booted only 200 kernels, instead of 2000 
> kernels) - which is OK in early phases of the merge window, but you seem 
> to deny that i have any standing to argue development process issues.


In my perception networking is not doing worse than other subsystems,
this (small) accumulation of build-bugs seems more like an unfortunate
coincidence caused by two people being sloppy during testing (me and
the LED guys).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/