linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 signals: lift flags diddling code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080421123554.GC9554@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:35:54 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86 signals: lift flags diddling code


* Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:

> This lifts the code diddling the TF and DF bits for signal handler 
> setup out of the several places copying the same code into the one 
> place that calls them all.  There is no change in what it does.
> 
> I also separated the recently-added DF bit clearing from the TF 
> diddling. The compiler turns them back into one instruction anyway.  
> The tossing in of DF to the same line of code with no new comments was 
> a bit more arcane than seems wise.

thanks Roland, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/