[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080421142948.GV9554@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:29:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, andi@...stfloor.org,
joern@...fs.org, w@....eu, lkml@....ca, bunk@...nel.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, shawn.bohrer@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:50:53 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 20:19:30 +0200
> > Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > In theory if you e.g. convert a recursive algorithm
> > > to iterative you might save some cache foot print, but I don't
> > > think that really happens in kernel code.
> > >
> >
> > this is what Al did for the symlink recursion thing, and Jens did
> > for the block layer... so yes this conversion does happen for real.
>
> md got mostly-fixed too, via Neil's patch which sat in -mm for nearly
> two years.
had we done the de-obfuscate-4K-stacks Kconfig change earlier it might
have gotten upstream faster.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists