linux-kernel - Re: StackProtector Oopses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080421150604.GH5474@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:06:04 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: StackProtector Oopses - Re: 2.6.25-mm1


* Reuben Farrelly <reuben-linuxkernel@...b.net> wrote:

>> hm, does it boot up fine with the attached patch and stackprotector 
>> enabled? It appears that your system got to the self-test so 
>> stackprotector is working mostly - it's just that the self-test went 
>> wrong.
>
> It boots up fine with that patch below and:
>
> tornado boot # grep STACKPROTECT /boot/config-2.6.25-mm1-wip
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL=y
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
>
> In fact I'm running with it applied right now and it all seems good so 
> far, so I guess that's confirmation that it is just the test itself 
> which is problematic?

yeah. Arjan - any new patches to try that might fix the bootup test?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/