[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080421154756.GA2424@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:47:56 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...l.org,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86 NMI-safe INT3 and Page Fault (v5)
* H. Peter Anvin (hpa@...or.com) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> Just to be clear : the added cost on normal interrupt return is to add a
>> supplementary test of the thread flags already loaded in registers and
>> a conditional branch. This is used to detect if we are nested over an
>> NMI handler. I doubt anyone ever notice an impact caused by this added
>> test/branch.
>
> Why the **** would you do this except in the handful of places where you
> actually *could* be nested over an NMI handler (basically #MC, #DB and
> INT3)?
>
> -hpa
>
There is also the page fault case. I think putting this test in
ret_from_exception would be both safe (it is executed for any
exception return) and fast (exceptions are rare).
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists