[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480CEDE5.3060008@firstfloor.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:41:25 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Tom Long Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Subject: Re: PCI MSI breaks when booting with nosmp
Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Monday, April 21, 2008 11:45 am Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> writes:
>>> Ok, I see this too on my desktop machine. It looks like we're not
>>> getting interrupts setup correctly in the nosmp case. Still digging
>>> through to see why though...
>> NoSMP disables the io-apic and a lot of modern systems don't work without
>> APIC.
>>
>> If you just want to run with a single cpu for testing etc. always use
>> maxcpus=1 (not 0, that will disable the APIC too)
>
> Right... but it looks like the MSI code is buggy when noapic is specified via
> nosmp or maxcpus=0. We should either fix it to work with noapic or disable
> it like we do the ioapic when nosmp or maxcpus=0:
First that would likely not compile on architectures without PCI?
Also there is more code in the guts of arch/x86 that disables the
IO-APIC and likely has the same problem. Best probably you put it all
into a single function that does it all properly instead of continuning
to open code it.
Just don't break the other architectures in main.c
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists