[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080421195517.GH8770@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:55:17 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
tglx@...utronix.de, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> thanks, the three patches below should fix it.
>>
>> i ended up excluding Voyager configs from our test space some time
>> ago (and VISWS as well - there's one more visws fix in x86.git),
>> that's how this broke. These subarchitectures seem not to be used at
>> all and the code wont boot on normal PCs. We could mark it BROKEN but
>> the fix seems simple in any case.
>
> I talked to jejb about this, and pretty much the consensus was that if
> it breaks, mark it BROKEN, and let him come back and catch up. Under
> those conditions, I'm willing to keep it in the tree.
sure - but no need to be rude and mark it BROKEN when we've got this
much better tool named "email". BROKEN is really just for cases where
there's no-one willing to fix things.
> VISWS is another matter. It's entirely possible I have the only
> remaining VISWS in my garage; we have at least not been able to locate
> another. Not that we have tried all that hard.
>
> If there are no VISWS' left, we should just unload the code.
ok, but there we should first mark it BROKEN, and after 1-2 kernel
releases remove it so that there's adequate notice.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists