[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080421201129.GL8770@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:11:29 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
tglx@...utronix.de, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Voyager phys_cpu_present_map compile error
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> sure - but no need to be rude and mark it BROKEN when we've got this much
>> better tool named "email". BROKEN is really just for cases where there's
>> no-one willing to fix things.
>
> I'm not trying to be rude, I'm just trying to avoid putting an
> unnecessary burden on testers and just let Kconfig know not to pick
> this particular random path. Obviously, Kconfig doesn't care, but
> it's clear BROKEN has negative associations; besides, it really is
> unnecessarily strong.
>
> Perhaps what we need is NORAND?
yep, i was thinking about CONFIG_BROKEN2 already :-)
then i came up with: CONFIG_NON_GENERIC. All code that can break a
normal bootup should be marked with that. Such as CONFIG_ROOT_NFS=y
[panics on bootup] or CONFIG_EUROTECH_WDT=y [crashes on bootup] or
CONFIG_SND_MTPAV [hangs on bootup] and the dozens of other config
options i had to map when trying to bring up an allyesconfig kernel for
the first time ;-)
auto-tests could then still build-test NON_GENERIC kernels but would not
attempt to boot them up.
hm?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists