linux-kernel - Re: i386 single-step vs int $0x80 issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080421212543.15E1F26F8F0@magilla.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i386 single-step vs int $0x80 issues

> Certainly I am interested in making all the cases work correctly.  The
> failure behavior was observed on an SMP system.  I re-tested to
> confirm the problem was still there.

Please help me reproduce this problem on the old code.  I have not been
able to see it.  You didn't say whether it was intermittent, nor give any
more details here.


Thanks,
Roland

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/