| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1FE6DD409037234FAB833C420AA843EC012664E0@orsmsx424.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:00:02 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Alex Chiang" <achiang@...com>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH, RFC] Create 'slot' sysfsattributein/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/
> I noticed that this patch wasn't in the git tree you sent to
> Linus for 2.6.26. I don't remember seeing a NACK though -- is
> there something that I could rework to make it more acceptable?
I'm mostly ok with this version of the patch. I didn't see any
comments from the linux-kernel crowd on the whether they are fond
of the new API ("slot" file in cpu/cpuN/topology/) and hate to make
the presumption that because they are silent that they agree.
The "mostly ok" part would transform to "fully ok" if there were a way
to make sure the "slot" files only appeared on systems where they are
meaningful (i.e. have a value other then -1 in them). If there is
an easy way to make this happen, then it would make me happier (less
clutter in /sys) and perhaps others too (since this API is only useful
on large systems where "slot" is meaningful, and there is generally
some bias from the community at large about adding interfaces that
aren't needed for normal desktop/laptop systems).
-Tony
Patch follows to save people digging in the archives to see what we
are talking about.
> Subject: [PATCH] Create 'slot' sysfs attribute in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/
> From: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
>
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuN/topology/physical_package_id exists,
> but may contain incorrect information, especially on older ia64
> platforms that do not have modern firmware.
>
> Create a 'slot' attribute and define an interface that may be
> populated via alternate sources, without breaking existing
> functionality.
>
> Implement this interface on ia64 by invoking the _SUN method on a
> per cpu basis.
>
> Leave other archs alone for now.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> - Stop stomping on existing PBLK in the event of _SUN failure
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Check for _SUN object on CPU before blindly attempting
> to call it
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
> ---
> arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
> arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 8 ++++++++
> drivers/base/topology.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/asm-ia64/cpu.h | 1 +
> include/asm-ia64/processor.h | 7 ++++++-
> include/asm-ia64/topology.h | 3 +++
> include/asm-x86/topology.h | 2 ++
> 8 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> index 4aa9eae..228d960 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ identify_cpu (struct cpuinfo_ia64 *c)
> */
> c->threads_per_core = c->cores_per_socket = c->num_log = 1;
> c->socket_id = -1;
> + c->slot = -1;
>
> identify_siblings(c);
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
> index a2484fc..512de14 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
>
> static struct ia64_cpu *sysfs_cpus;
>
> +void ia64_set_topology_slot(int num, u32 slot)
> +{
> + cpu_data(num)->slot = slot;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ia64_set_topology_slot);
> +
> int arch_register_cpu(int num)
> {
> #if defined (CONFIG_ACPI) && defined (CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index 36a68fa..a3a740d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -612,6 +612,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_processor *pr, unsigned has_uid)
> request_region(pr->throttling.address, 6, "ACPI CPU throttle");
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If ACPI describes a slot number for this CPU, let's fill it in
> + */
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_SUN", NULL, &buffer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + object.integer.value = -1;
> + arch_set_topology_slot(pr->id, object.integer.value);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
> index e1d3ad4..4fcffca 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,14 @@ define_one_ro(physical_package_id);
> #define ref_physical_package_id_attr
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef topology_slot
> +define_id_show_func(slot);
> +define_one_ro(slot);
> +#define ref_slot_attr &attr_slot.attr,
> +#else
> +#define ref_slot_attr
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef topology_core_id
> define_id_show_func(core_id);
> define_one_ro(core_id);
> @@ -83,6 +91,7 @@ define_one_ro(core_siblings);
>
> static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
> ref_physical_package_id_attr
> + ref_slot_attr
> ref_core_id_attr
> ref_thread_siblings_attr
> ref_core_siblings_attr
> diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/cpu.h b/include/asm-ia64/cpu.h
> index e87fa32..393e545 100644
> --- a/include/asm-ia64/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/asm-ia64/cpu.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct ia64_cpu, cpu_devices);
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_state);
>
> +extern void arch_set_topology_slot(int num, u32 slot);
> extern int arch_register_cpu(int num);
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> extern void arch_unregister_cpu(int);
> diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
> index 741f7ec..066553c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
> +++ b/include/asm-ia64/processor.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,10 @@ struct ia64_psr {
> */
> struct cpuinfo_ia64 {
> __u32 softirq_pending;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + int cpu;
> +#endif
> __u64 itm_delta; /* # of clock cycles between clock ticks */
> __u64 itm_next; /* interval timer mask value to use for next clock tick */
> __u64 nsec_per_cyc; /* (1000000000<<IA64_NSEC_PER_CYC_SHIFT)/itc_freq */
> @@ -140,7 +144,6 @@ struct cpuinfo_ia64 {
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> __u64 loops_per_jiffy;
> - int cpu;
> __u32 socket_id; /* physical processor socket id */
> __u16 core_id; /* core id */
> __u16 thread_id; /* thread id */
> @@ -150,6 +153,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_ia64 {
> __u8 threads_per_core; /* Threads per core */
> #endif
>
> + __u32 slot; /* physical slot; can differ from socket_id */
> +
> /* CPUID-derived information: */
> __u64 ppn;
> __u64 features;
> diff --git a/include/asm-ia64/topology.h b/include/asm-ia64/topology.h
> index 2d67b72..f986693 100644
> --- a/include/asm-ia64/topology.h
> +++ b/include/asm-ia64/topology.h
> @@ -110,12 +110,15 @@ void build_cpu_to_node_map(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu)->socket_id)
> +#define topology_slot(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu)->slot)
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu)->core_id)
> #define topology_core_siblings(cpu) (cpu_core_map[cpu])
> #define topology_thread_siblings(cpu) (per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu))
> #define smt_capable() (smp_num_siblings > 1)
> #endif
>
> +#define arch_set_topology_slot(num, slot) ia64_set_topology_slot(num,slot)
> +
> #include <asm-generic/topology.h>
>
> #endif /* _ASM_IA64_TOPOLOGY_H */
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/topology.h b/include/asm-x86/topology.h
> index 8af05a9..d4c922c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/topology.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/topology.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,8 @@ extern cpumask_t cpu_coregroup_map(int cpu);
> #define topology_thread_siblings(cpu) (per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu))
> #endif
>
> +#define arch_set_topology_slot(num, slot)
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define mc_capable() (boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores > 1)
> #define smt_capable() (smp_num_siblings > 1)
> --
> 1.5.3.1.g1e61
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists