[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080422084404.GA2388@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:44:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use canary at end of stack to indicate overruns at
oops time
* Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> Use a canary at the end of the stack to clearly indicate at oops time
> whether the stack has ever overflowed.
>
> This is a very simple implementation with a couple of drawbacks:
>
> 1) a thread may legitimately use exactly up to the last
> word on the stack
>
> -- but the chances of doing this and then oopsing later seem slim
even that narrow case is a bug - an NMI might arrive at exactly that
point and overflow the stack for real.
> 2) it's possible that the stack usage isn't dense enough
> that the canary location could get skipped over
>
> -- but the worst that happens is that we don't flag the overrun
yeah.
> With the code in place, an intentionally-bloated stack oops does:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff8103f84cc680
> IP: [<ffffffff810253df>] update_curr+0x9a/0xa8
> PGD 8063 PUD 0
> Thread overran stack or stack corrupted
> Oops: 0000 [1] SMP
> CPU 0
> ...
excellent. I've queued this up, it's definitely an improvement in
debuggability.
we used to have something comparable in ancient kernels (it was called
the stack red zone IIRC) - but it was not printed in oopses and we lost
the feature somewhere anyway.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists