[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080422090921.GA130@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:09:21 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0.01/1] hlist_for_each_entry_xxx: kill the "pos" argument
On 04/21, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 07:14:43PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > (The actual patch is huge, 116K, I'll send it offline. This email contains
> > the chunk for list.h only).
> >
> > COMPILE TESTED ONLY (make allyesconfig).
> >
> > All hlist_for_each_entry_xxx() macros require the "pos" argument, which is not
> > actually needed and can be removed. See the changes in include/linux/list.h
> > (note that hlist_for_each_entry_safe() now does prefetch() too).
>
> Might it be better to do this in two
> phases to allow these patches to be applied incrementally?
>
> 1. Change all to "obsolete" __hlist_for_each_entry_xxx().
>
> 2. Incrementally change to hlist_for_each_entry_xxx(), removing
> the extra variable where possible.
Yes sure. Actually this was my initial plan.
Andrew, which way do you prefer? and should I wait for -rc1?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists