[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200804221448.09828.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:48:09 +0200
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86: 4kstacks default
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 03:28, David Chinner wrote:
> We've already chopped off the low hanging fruit, added noinline to
> every function definition to prevent compiler heuristics from
> blowing out stack usage by 25% and reduced use of temporary
> variables as much as possible. There's very little fat left to trim,
> and still we can't reliably fit in 4k stacks.
At yet, I got four screenfuls of
fs/xfs/XXXXX.c: warning: unused parameter 'foo'
when I added -Wunused_parameter to Makefile.
Clearly there is some room for improvement.
> Patches are welcome - I'd be over the moon if any of the known 4k
> stack advocates sent a stack reduction patch for XFS, but it seems
> that actually trying to fix the problems is much harder than
> resending a one line patch every few months....
Sent a few.
I would like to ask you to ACK/NAK every individual patch
in some reasonable period of time, say, 1-3 days. If you NAK a patch,
please let me know what is wrong with it.
I am not eager at all to experience a repeat of aic7xxx
patch saga, when I was not getting any meaningful reply
for months.
Best regards, Denys.
--
vda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists