linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080422154216.GI19802@phobos.i.cabal.ca>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:42:16 -0400
From:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
	Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SYSFS

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 05:38:19PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > 
> > This should (imnsho, at least),
> >         1 - Add a cond_syscall for sys_sysfs to sys_ni.c
> >         2 - Use a CONFIG_EMBEDDED dependent option that defaults on,
> >             possibly depend on BLACKFIN if you really want to.
> > 
> > Adding this junk to every arch header is, in my opinion, completely
> > unacceptable just because blackfin wants to be different.
> 
> It's not that they want to be different, but rather that I (among others)
> requested that they don't implement obsolete syscalls, so they removed it
> from their syscall table.
> 

Ah, I stupidly assumed sys_sysfs was something to do with /sys.

regards, Kyle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/