linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] dlm updates for 2.6.26

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221344470.2779@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 13:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dlm updates for 2.6.26



On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, David Teigland wrote:
> 
> Please pull dlm updates for 2.6.26 from:

Small detail: can you please use "--stat --summary -M" to generate the 
diffstat, because you had:

>  ...
>  21 files changed, 614 insertions(+), 499 deletions(-)

but what I then check against notices the rename, and becomes:

 ...
 20 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
 rename fs/{gfs2/locking => }/dlm/plock.c (67%)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/dlm_plock.h
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/lock_dlm_plock.h

which I think is more accurate as to how big the changes were, as well as 
just more human-readable and informative.

(Apparently the naming changes in lock_dlm_plock.h -> dlm_plock.h makes it 
be effectively a rewrite, explaining why it's not two renames..)

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/