[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5739699.1208898133855.JavaMail.oracle@acsmt302.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:02:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: Randy Dunlap <RANDY.DUNLAP@...CLE.COM>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: jason.wessel@...driver.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kgdb: core
--- Original Message --- (akpm wrote:)
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:25:19 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > kernel-doc output doesn't depend on build $ARCH.
>
> Ah, interesting. I made an ass of u and me.
>
> In that case documentng them in x86 .c and leaving all other definitions
> and declarations uncommented sounds the way to go?
Yes, that would be fine and traditional (historical).
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists