linux-kernel - Re: Disk geometry from /sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480E6A35.4040108@rtr.ca>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:44:05 -0400
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
Cc:	Seewer Philippe <philippe.seewer@....ch>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disk geometry from /sys

Francis Moreau wrote:
> Hello Mark
> 
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>>  That can sound a bit misleading.  The complete story, for ATA/SATA drives,
>>  is that the disk has two geometries:  an internal physical one, with a
>> fixed number of heads and cylinders, but variable sectors/track
>>  (which normally varies by cylinder zone).
>>
>>  Software *never* sees or knows about that geometry, so ignore it.
>>
>>  The second geometry, is the one that the drive reports to software
>>  as its "native" geometry.  This is what you see from "hdparm -I"
>>  and friends, and this geometry is what has to be used by software
>>  when using cylinder/head/sector (CHS) addressing for I/O operations.
>>  The hardware interface has a limit of 4-bits for the head value,
>>  so the maximum number of heads can never be more than 16.
>>
>>  Nobody uses CHS addressing for I/O operations, at least not on
>>  any hardware newer than at least ten years old, so this geometry
>>  is also unimportant for most uses.
>>
> 
> Is it because IDE drives support several IO operation modes ?
..

The earliest IDE drives for Compaq used only CHS sector addressing mode.

Within four years, though, all new drives had support for the more 
sensible linear block addressing (LBA) mode, as well.

LBA has been mandatory in new drives since the early 1990s,
so there's really no point to CHS addressing any more,
except when fiddling with MS-DOS style partition tables
(which have both CHS and LBA values stored inside).

Cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/