[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480E6DE5.6010103@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:59:49 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [git patch] free_irq() fixes
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Quite frankly, I'd actually prefer to just reinstate "dev" to the irq
> registration instead.
>
> Why? Because that field is how we are able to track multiple interrupt
> registrations that share an IRQ. Now, the "request_irq()" logic has a
> special rule that actually tests that NULL is a valid cookie if the
> IRQF_SHARED bit isn't set, but isn't it a nice thing to double-check
> regardless?
[...]
> This, in contrast, *really* sucks as a cookie. In fact, it's useless. If
> there are multiple tp3780i instances on the same irq, they will always
> have the same cookie.
AFAICS that will never happen for mwave hardware.
Nonetheless, it's a good point that NULL fails for disambiguation, so I
created the attached, which should do what you want. I'll push it after
the compiler gives it a green light (unless it needs further revisions)
(note, for mwave I couldn't use pSettings, since that might fail the
ambiguity test)
Jeff
View attachment "patch" of type "text/plain" (3647 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists