| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1208833137.1366.1249155597@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:58:57 -0700 From: "Kai" <epimetreus@...tmail.fm> To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, "Mike Galbraith" <efault@....de> Subject: Re: Serious performance regression in Wine applications and Linux 2.6.24.* That is possible; I will see if I'm only using one core in 2.6.23 as well; if not, that might suggest what our problem is. On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:53:42 +0200, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu> said: > > * Kai <epimetreus@...tmail.fm> wrote: > > > I did, however, test it on 2.6.25-rc8, and attached is the output of > > cfs-debug-info.sh > > your vmstat: > > -- vmstat: > --procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- > ----cpu---- > r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy > id wa > 3 0 0 870540 340 746184 0 0 952 137 198 4752 21 12 > 60 7 > 1 0 0 870952 340 746320 0 0 128 0 356 17723 28 23 > 50 0 > 1 0 0 872224 340 746320 0 0 0 21 394 18066 30 20 > 50 0 > 1 0 0 872244 340 746320 0 0 0 0 353 17987 29 22 > 50 0 > 1 0 0 871416 340 746320 0 0 0 0 392 17971 28 22 > 50 0 > > suggests that there's a constant 50% idle time. Probably one core > running X and the client, the other core staying idle? > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists