[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480F1A9E.6080003@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:16:46 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Mark Lord <liml@....ca>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] select ATA_SFF
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Aik... We can do s/sff/tf/ and leave bmdma alone to avoid even more
>> confusion but sff has meant tf base interface for quite some time now
>> in libata and I think it'll be better to remember that sff is the new
>> tf. Sorry about the mess.
> This renaming was discussed at the time on lkml and linux-ide, the
> patches and git pushes were CC'd, and I do not recall these complaints
> being raised at the time.
I wasn't watching libata activity even to such a small extent that I'm
doing it now, and I haven't found the discussion now.
> At this point, it's too ingrained in libata. Another rename would IMO
> just cause more needless churn.
Well, renaming -bmdma to -sff was logical. What's not so logical is that
module covering not only BMDMA activities but also taskfile access.
> Jeff
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists