[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080423133656.GA23782@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:36:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
Subject: Re: [patch] softlockup: fix false positives on nohz if CPU is 100%
idle for more than 60 seconds
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> > It may take some time, as each test run the verify the existence of
> > the problem takes several minutes.
>
> Ok, Ingo, none of your patches fix even the initial buggy changeset,
> for reference:
as a temporary workaround please try the patch below, until we can
reproduce and fix the bug.
Ingo
------------------------------->
Subject: softlockup: nohz workaround
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Wed Apr 23 15:19:32 CEST 2008
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/softlockup.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/kernel/softlockup.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softlockup.c
+++ linux/kernel/softlockup.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int watchdog(void *__bind_cpu)
*/
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
- schedule();
+ schedule_timeout(softlockup_thresh/2);
if (kthread_should_stop())
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists