[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208964798.17117.72.camel@nimitz.home.sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:33:18 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...allels.com>
Cc: containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nadia.Derbey@...l.net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
nick@...k-andrew.net, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Checkpoint/restart (was Re: [PATCH 0/4] - v2 - Object
creation with a specified id)
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 10:40 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> Having all this functionality in a signle syscall we specifically CLAIM a black box,
> and that no one can use this interfaces for something different from checkpoint/restore.
>
> So I think we have to know what other maintainers think before we can go.
I completely agree.
Have you asked any particular maintainers what they think?
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists