[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804231110030.12373@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...ranet.com>
cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@...oo.com>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01 of 12] Core of mmu notifiers
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:20:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I guess I have to prepare another patchset then?
>
> If you want to embarrass yourself three time in a row go ahead ;). I
> thought two failed takeovers was enough.
Takeover? I'd be happy if I would not have to deal with this issue.
These patches were necessary because you were not listening to
feedback plus there is the issue that your patchsets were not easy to
review or diff against. I had to merge several patches to get to a useful
patch. You have always picked up lots of stuff from my patchsets. Lots of
work that could have been avoided by proper patchsets in the first place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists