[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <480F95BE.60109@aknet.ru>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:02:06 +0400
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC)
Hello.
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> + printk(KERN_WARNING "PCSP: CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is enabled, "
>> + KERN_WARNING "which may make the sound noisy.\n");
> Missing \n in the first line?
This was intentional - wanted it to
print in a single line. You see a space
there for that reason.
Should the second KERN_WARNING be removed
then, or what is the problem exactly?
>> - Prevent pcspkr from being built together
>> > with snd-pcsp.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
> Thanks, applied to my git tree.
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git
> Meanwhile, we need to add a similar depenency to snd-pcsp as well, no?
I personally don't think so.
snd-pcsp has the excact copy of the pcspkr
code built-in, so I thought pcspkr can be
obsoleted in the future. From that point of
view, having snd-pcsp enabled and not even
seeing pcspkr in a menuconfig is fine.
While otherwise (you ocasionally enable
pcspkr and don't even see snd-pcsp then)
is not fine.
You mentioned earlier that you would like
to be able to swap those drivers dynamically,
but... what's the use? With such a dependancy
added, many people will not even know about
snd-pcsp as they already have pcspkr enabled.
> Fixed on ALSA tree now.
Oh...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists