[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4e36d110804231327t3a4f90e0ya44b68c42e9dee2e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:27:53 +0200
From: "Zdenek Kabelac" <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
To: "Pekka J Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: "Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-git2: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffffff
2008/4/23, Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > We should have returned from the function and not printed this message. If
> > we somehow skipped the test for !fault then end could have wrapped around
> > which gets us to 4GB.
>
>
> Aah, looks like it's just a silly bug in slab_fix(). If this looks ok to
> Christoph, can you re-test with this patch applied Zdenek? That way we'll
> actually know where SLUB expected to see POISON_INUSE.
Unfortunately it won't be easy to retest - I just know it happened to
me with some wi-fi networking interaction after resume. I'll rebuild
kernel with these slab patches - but I have now idea how to trigger
the bug.
In the attachment is bzip-ed dmesg in case it would be still needed
for something.
Zdenek
Download attachment "messages.txt.bz2" of type "application/x-bzip2" (17363 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists