linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Further shrink ifdef sections in fault.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480EE32A.1040502@henry.nestler.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:20:10 +0200
From:	Henry Nestler <henry.nestler@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	harvey.harrison@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: Further shrink ifdef sections in fault.c

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> +	if (!(address >= VMALLOC_START && address < VMALLOC_END))
>> +		return -1;
> 
> ah, this explains the weird chunk in your other patch.

Why this is not in x86_32?

Please see my other mail "x86: endless page faults in mount_block_root
for Linux 2.6", with problem without this check.

-- 
Henry N.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/